Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:52 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aiee, I sense this is not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2000 12:59:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 13 06:59:28 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from office.globe.cz (intra.office.globe.cz) [212.27.204.26]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 146BVH-0007xX-00; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:59:28 -0600
Received: from ondrej.office.globe.cz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [10.1.2.22])
by intra.office.globe.cz (8.11.0.Beta1/8.11.0.Beta1/Debian 8.11.0-1)
with SMTP id eBDCxNI14954
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:59:23 +0100
Received: (qmail 4342 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Dec 2000 12:59:17 -0000
Date: 13 Dec 2000 12:59:17 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg: Assertion `dyp->up == pigp' failed.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.7.2
Severity: normal
I have got this error message, I thought this would be interesting:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~# apt-get install efax
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
efax
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 49 not upgraded.
Need to get 99.6kB of archives. After unpacking 232kB will be used.
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main efax 1:0.9a-3 [99.6kB]
Fetched 99.6kB in 9s (10.6kB/s)
(Reading database ... 61594 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking efax (from .../efax_1%3a0.9a-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: /home/wichert/sources/cvs/debian/x/dpkg-1.7.2/lib/dump.c:180:
w_dependency: Assertion `dyp->up == pigp' failed.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg exited unexpectedly
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux ondrej 2.2.18pre24ext3 #1 SMP Mon Dec 4 18:04:55 CET 2000
i586 unknown
Versions of the packages dpkg depends on:
ii libc6 2.2-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libncurses5 5.0-8 Shared libraries for terminal handling
ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.2-20 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 79807-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2003 06:35:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 12 00:35:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au [203.28.240.16]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AJobb-0003Fa-00; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:35:55 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126F2B3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:51 +1100 (EST)
Received: from epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (epistula [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 03687-02-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:50 +1100 (EST)
Received: from roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au
[203.28.240.3])
by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABC2A5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:50 +1100 (EST)
Received: by roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix, from userid 1280)
id 0C08117E3C; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:53 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:52 +1100
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aiee, I sense this is not a bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-GnuPG-Key: 3CED7EFD
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p3 (Debian) at trinity.unimelb.edu.au
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Looking back at the bug log for #79807, I doubt xfonts-base was making
my / ro, somehow.
--=20
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org>
Debian X Strike Force: http://people.debian.org/~branden=
/xsf/
--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/sdTIcPClnTztfv0RAv8uAKCO/25vlH0tS6OZoL8kk4OKeaMg6QCfUVu3
h51Z+SPowWXwgRWQYoHH5wg=
=/SGT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/--
