On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 06:05:09AM +0000, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > And I've set that up now.[1] Its running on DebConf machines, who now do
> > the DNS, MX and webhosting for it. The MX currently knows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > pointing to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
> > those 3 also have
> 
> That should probably be changed.
> 
> I'm personnally really aside from the dpkg development, apart from
> doing the maintenance of l10n stuff. On the other hand, since Scott
> left, other people joined the dpkg development and should be part of
> that [EMAIL PROTECTED] thing.....if this is still useful.
> 
> I'm not entirely convinced that keeping that address alive is useful,
> indeed. We'd better point people to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I would support that. This additional e-mail address only serves to
duplicate mails and hide them from other interested persons.

I would vote for making it an alias to the list and change the
maintainer address to the list.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to