On Wed, 09 Jan 2008, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 08:59:55 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > > I'm not entirely convinced that keeping that address alive is useful, > > > > indeed. We'd better point people to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > I would support that. This additional e-mail address only serves to > > > duplicate mails and hide them from other interested persons. > > > > > > I would vote for making it an alias to the list and change the > > > maintainer address to the list. > > > > Ack and get rid of [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which I never used anyway since > > I subscribe directly via the PTS). > > The only problem I have with that is that it would pollute debian-dpkg > with bug reports, which are already on the BTS (and currently not > archived in debian-dpkg-bugs). I don't have any problem in getting rid > of debian-dpkg-bugs, though.
Is anyone reading [EMAIL PROTECTED] here that would be bothered if they received the BTS mails related to dpkg ? (I wouldn't, I would just unsubscribe from the PTS) Alternatively, we could ask the listmasters to drop the BTS mails for the list. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
