Hi! On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:29:04 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]> writes: > > Is --list supposed to be only human-readable? Then we can change output > > format a bit to make it more localizable (12 similar strings like "local > > diversion of %s to %s by %s", "diversion of %s", "any diversion of %s by > > %s"... are localizable, but insane). > > I think some maintainer scripts use --list. But I think they only care > wether there is a diversion. Maybe a --test for testing if something > is already diverted by a previous version and --list for users would > be better.
dpkg-divert already has a --test option which is a dry-run. Also there's already --listpackage and --truename to be used for such automated checks. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
