Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Jonas Smedegaard] > >>>Furthemore, the policy told me that missing man >>>pages are considered as a bug, so a new bug has been filed in >>>bugs.sk.no (#1030) >> >>Please file such bug in the Debian BTS rather than the Skolelinux one. > > > Good idea. If the package and the bug is in Debian, we should file a > bug in BTS (we could have one in bugzilla as well, to keep track of > it, but I prefer to tag the BTS bugs 'debian-edu' instead.) > > >>This may not be obvious, so here is my understanding on best approach: >> >> * Use Debian BTS for packages in Debian maintained by debian-edu
Except when we use a newer version in the daily build than the one availible from Debian. And this happens all the time. I was told that I could be blacklisted from Debian BTS for doing so by one of our developers when I filled a bug agains a version that was newer than the one in debian. There was no sign in reportbug nor anywere else that this report should not go against debian BTS. -- Finn-Arne Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bzz.no/ Debian-edu developer and Solution provider EE2A71C6403A3D191FCDC043006F1215062E6642 062E6642 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
