[Holger Levsen] > IMO we should aim to^w^w release 3.0r1 in a month, even if only/mostly with > documentation fixes (though other fixes are fine too). Then r2 another month > later. And then concentrate on lenny.
I believe this is too short time frame to manage much improvements, especially since we have spent a lot of time on the r0 time frame, and I suspect others like me will have to spend time on other projects that has been waiting for a while. > What do you think? I liked your previous proposal better. For r1, I want to - Upgrade the debian-cd build framework to the latest svn version. - Include a windows installer on the CDs and DVD. - Include on the DVD some Windows install packages for useful Windows software (OOo, Firefox, etc). - Update the documentation. - Find a way to check the SSL certificates when talking to the LDAP server, and fix lwat and samba to work with the new setup. - Update libpam-foreground to a clean backport from sid/lenny instead of our home patched version. - Change the task installation framework to handle language specific list of packages to install. - Update the network-manager packages to use a backport from unstable to fix some console user access issues. (And only install it in standalone and not workstation+laptops installs) And for this I believe 1 month is to little. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
