Hi, On Tuesday 24 July 2007 14:39, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Holger Levsen] > > IMO we should aim to^w^w release 3.0r1 in a month, even if only/mostly > > with documentation fixes (though other fixes are fine too). Then r2 > > another month later. And then concentrate on lenny. > I believe this is too short time frame to manage much improvements, > especially since we have spent a lot of time on the r0 time frame, and > I suspect others like me will have to spend time on other projects > that has been waiting for a while.
You were right: now two months have passed and we still haven't released
r1 :-/ :-)
Time to tackle it a bit more ;)
[priorities in bugzilla]
> > What do you think?
> I liked your previous proposal better.
I'm writing this offline and replying to this makes most sense while looking
at bugzilla, which I currently cant...
> For r1, I want to
> - Upgrade the debian-cd build framework to the latest svn version.
has that happened?
> - Include a windows installer on the CDs and DVD.
you mean like the one debian has for lenny now? has anyone looked into using
this on etch?
> - Include on the DVD some Windows install packages for useful Windows
> software (OOo, Firefox, etc).
I don't think this has happened and I don't consider this important. There
are "free software-cds for windows", why bother to create another?
> - Update the documentation.
This still needs to be done, content-, translation- and packaging wise.
> - Find a way to check the SSL certificates when talking to the LDAP
> server, and fix lwat and samba to work with the new setup.
has that happened?
> - Update libpam-foreground to a clean backport from sid/lenny instead
> of our home patched version.
I think this has happened, correct?
> - Change the task installation framework to handle language specific
> list of packages to install.
has that happened?
> - Update the network-manager packages to use a backport from unstable
> to fix some console user access issues. (And only install it in
> standalone and not workstation+laptops installs)
has that happened?
Anything else (besides highprio bugs) we need to fix before we can release r1?
regards,
Holger
pgpguLJpfikZs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
