Hi,

On Thursday 28 February 2008 16:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hmmm, once I tried without reassigning and got a message that
> I would try to close bug that belongs to a different package
> which is not possible.  I would regard this as a reasonable
> measure to prevent closing bugs unintentionally because of
> typos.  Did this changed in the last time?

Hm. Maybe. I was fairly sure I've seen wrong bugs (in different packages) 
closed recently, but maybe it was a longer time ago...

But still, reassigning takes to seconds. (And I've already done it for this 
bug.)

> Well, the original reporter raised three different points in
> his bug report (filed three times :-() and I wonder which point
> he regards as grave and especially why.

You dont need to be the bugreporter to rate FTBFS and missing sources as clear 
policy violations :-) (The missing sources are not intentional, thats why I 
set #468346 to important only.)

Also, the severity is at the maintainers discretion.


regards,
        Holger

Attachment: pgpTvpbfP1S8l.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to