Hi, On Saturday 01 March 2008 15:47, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Either we make the package arch: any, and build on some or all archs, > > or we make it arch: all, and stop building on more than one arch. I > > believe you are discussing which list of architectures to support if > > it isn't arch: all, while at least I believed Andreas to discuss if we > > should convert the package to arch: all.
Well, appearantly the package is indeed arch all, but builds a different
package if build on different archs, which I consider a bug - or this is
cleverly worked around by allways building a package modelled for i386 but
labelled arch all ;)
> Yep. If we have arch all we will end up with some missing Recommends
> on certain not so good suported architectures. The question is whether
> missing recommends will trigger bug reports or not.
They will. Maybe not today, maybe not not even in Debian Edu, but then
eventuelly in Debian Med or somewhere else.
> IMHO they should not
> be RC but I would not like to have unfixable bugs even with lower
> priority.
Yup :)
regards,
Holger
pgpquTnjW0v9C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
