-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:04:00AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>On Sunday 22 June 2008 10:31, Pietro Battiston wrote: >> It is completely GPL v.3. I am the upstream developer. > >in debian/copyright you say it's GPL2+, while the file COPYING says >GPL3+ - please make up your mind ;) > >(And then debian/copyrights refers to /usr/share/common-licences/GPL, >which is the GPL3, so that's another (normal) bug.) Why is that (the last part) a bug? GPL2+ _includes_ GPL3, so pointing to that newer version of the license should be ok, no? I suspect you confuse that with the problem of licensing GPL2 (without allowing newer version) which now needs to include a local license text. >Please also remove the word "nice" from the short description >(debian/control), all software is nice, isn't it? :) /all software/all free software/ ;-) - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkheHRYACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiSOgCghVH6PWCcARy+hWhS/apBcpsM 8RQAniBOaH02rzC1gAcNBPL2TaxqL+zz =15zi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
