-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 01:29:26PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: >Hi, > >On Sunday 22 June 2008 13:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >I discussed this issue over yesterday (with my Debian Edu ftpmaster >> >hat), first with Petter (who uploaded a package with such a copyright), >> >then with Jörg Jaspert (as Debian ftpmaster). At first I consided this > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >bug to be RC, but now I agree that, while not perfectly correct, this > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >is not serious at all. >> >> This could give the impression that Jörg and Petter agrees with you on >> this, but really you only say that discussing with them made you relax >> your standpoint from RC to normal.
I tried disambiguating. You want to play games intstead - ok. On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 01:34:35PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >Note that I am not conviced that pointing to >/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL in a licensed using GPL v2+ is a bug, So it seems what you really want to say is that you agree with Jörg (and him alone). Did I understand that correctly? Do you see how your original text was ambigous? >> I still fail to understand why it is a bug to refer to GPLv3 when the >> copyright holder permits to redistribute under... > >Do you see why it is buggy to depend on python2.5 when a depends on >python is enough? Yes. Due to Python policy. Do you see why picking a different license for a dual-licensed project is not a bug but at most a wishlist request (when not covered by some packaging policy)? - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkheSu0ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiS/wCfQiuEZsuHoE+ccnOlWS//ReBE aYQAoJU2zQ9cSAl+f/rOQ65O3i53I5DW =+VaS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
