[Jonas Smedegaard] > Has the alternative etckeeper been considered for new installs?
I tested it, and etckeeper seem to be interactive, asking the user for comments when packages is upgraded/installed. etcinsvk is not interactive, and only record changes. I did ask for svk support in etckeeper to be able to migrate to it, but do not believe anyone implemented it yet. After testing etckeeper, I am not sure we want to. We use svk because it allow us to keep /etc/ in version control without any files showing up in /etc/ to indicate that it is being done, and thus no confusion about for example .svn files in /etc/ will arrive. :) > Haven't done a comparison, but speed is generally one of the > benefits of Git that etckeeper uses as backend. Yeah. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
