-=| Ben Armstrong, Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:42:51AM -0400 |=- > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:11:32 +0200 > Damyan Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Or > > ^X-Spam-Level: \*\* > > (that is, everything from 2.0 up) > > OK. So what about the actions to attach to each? Currently I have > spam divided into two categories, those which we're sure are spam and > those which we aren't: > > Defer: ^X-Spam-Flag: YES > Hold: ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*
From the mailman help: Use Defer to temporarily disable a rule. (iow, it defers the desision to later rules) > Am I imagining it or does Defer not send notification to the user > whereas Hold does? Hold and Reject notify the sender, Discard just drops the mail without telling anyone > If there are never any false positives with X-Spam-Flag: YES, I may > later set that to Discard to ease the administrative burden. Or 'Reject', which would inform legitimate senders there is a problem (and the could tell us). So 'Hold' for 'probably spam' and Discard/Reject for 'surely spam'
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel
