Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006 22:30, vous avez écrit : > >> > Now, how about you describe straight how you'd see it to be >> > implemented and we begin constructive discussions instead, please? >> > Thanks. >> >> It is not like I have not explained this several times already. > > You did not read me. I talked about solutions, not problems.
And I spelled out how to design a package system that would not confuse both Emacs/XEmacs and the Emacs/XEmacs maintainers, what principles are violated by the current system, how to diagnose that, and that one could use either copies of the Elisp files into the package trees, or symbolic links in order to have the required proximity of Elisp and compiled files. A waste of time. You snip everything and keep telling me into my face that I did not say anything constructive. If that is what you insist on believing, there is little I can do about it. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
