In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are not many boot loaders that support such a wide range of
> different architectures (PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, ColdFire, NIOS, ...). At
> the moment U-Boot comes with default configurations for about 200
> different board, including 29 ARM boards (not counting boards which
> come in different configurations).
I'm aware of that, as I think most of us are, but my point that it's not
appropriate for all circumstances remains. As such, we have to contend
with multiple bootloaders.
> You wrote: "There might be a call for a monolithic ARM boolloader". I
> just wanted to point out that U-Boot has been successfully in use for
> exactly this purpose for a long, long time.
No, you misquoted me. The phrase was "ARM bootloader _package_". which
is most certainly what I meant, particularly in reply to Wookey's point
of removing packages that are only in use on a few systems.
--
Peter Naulls - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.chocky.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
RISC OS C Programming | http://www.riscos.info/
