Покотиленко Костик wrote: > В Птн, 18/08/2006 в 14:20 +0100, George Borisov пишет: >> Покотиленко Костик wrote: >>> So, to summarize, the is no default route in main routing table. >>> Each group of clients is to be routed through its respective >>> connection, and, when its connection is down it is not to be >>> routed. >> Last time I successfully configured split routing I did have a >> default gateway in the main table. >> >> >> Hope this helps, > > Unfortunately, all samples in the net's resources are *having* > default route in main table, that's why it's so difficult for me to > understand what is happening.
Hi, Perhaps some examples from my configuration can help you. I've been experimenting with split routing the last few months. Instead of using /etc/network/interfaces and ifupdown, i created an init script that configures network interfaces and routing with iproute. It's not perfect yet (and part of the comment in there are dutch), but it does the job: http://od11.fttd-s.tudelft.nl/~knorrie/iproute/mynetwork http://od11.fttd-s.tudelft.nl/~knorrie/iproute/rt_tables Documentation I used: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt Some lines from the iptables firewall script: http://od11.fttd-s.tudelft.nl/~knorrie/iproute/firewall CONNMARK is supported by a >2.6.12 kernel. HTH I cant promise the files (at the http://od11..) will be there online forever... Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
