В Птн, 18/08/2006 в 16:21 +0200, Hans van Kranenburg пишет: > Покотиленко Костик wrote: > > В Птн, 18/08/2006 в 14:20 +0100, George Borisov пишет: > >> Покотиленко Костик wrote: > >>> So, to summarize, the is no default route in main routing table. > >>> Each group of clients is to be routed through its respective > >>> connection, and, when its connection is down it is not to be > >>> routed. > >> Last time I successfully configured split routing I did have a > >> default gateway in the main table. > >> > >> > >> Hope this helps, > > > > Unfortunately, all samples in the net's resources are *having* > > default route in main table, that's why it's so difficult for me to > > understand what is happening. > > Hi, > > Perhaps some examples from my configuration can help you. I've been > experimenting with split routing the last few months. Instead of using > /etc/network/interfaces and ifupdown, i created an init script that > configures network interfaces and routing with iproute. It's not perfect > yet (and part of the comment in there are dutch), but it does the job: > > http://od11.fttd-s.tudelft.nl/~knorrie/iproute/mynetwork > http://od11.fttd-s.tudelft.nl/~knorrie/iproute/rt_tables > > Documentation I used: > http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html > http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt > > Some lines from the iptables firewall script: > http://od11.fttd-s.tudelft.nl/~knorrie/iproute/firewall > > CONNMARK is supported by a >2.6.12 kernel. > > HTH > I cant promise the files (at the http://od11..) will be there online > forever...
Thanks for sharing. My setup uses /etc/network/interfaces, if<up|down>, /etc/ppp/ip.<up| down>. So it doen't depend on the interface numbers being switched after DSL reconnect. It depend of PPP's "provider-name" options. Hope someday I'll be able to share my scripts. -- Покотиленко Костик <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
