Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:46:59 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#301140: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to
manage this package : filenames too long (on my box at least)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2005 23:51:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 23 15:51:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEFdK-00086d-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:51:30 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (mx4.eaglesnest.net [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 011931C00CF7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:50:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from argos.server.maison
(AToulouse-152-1-27-33.w82-125.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.125.25.33])
by mwinf0108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BF53D1C00CF6;
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:50:58 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DEFcu-0005fR-Ic; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:51:04 +0100
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:51:04 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to manage this package : filenames too
long (on my box at least)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.9
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libstdc++6-4.0-doc
Version: 4.0-0pre5
Severity: important
Installation leads too :
Preparing to replace libstdc++6-4.0-doc 4.0-0pre5 (using
.../libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0-0pre8_all.deb) ...
Document `libstdc++6-4.0-doc' is not installed, cannot remove.
Unpacking replacement libstdc++6-4.0-doc ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0-0pre8_all.deb
(--unpack):
unable to clean up mess surrounding
`./usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0-base/libstdc++/html_user/structstd_1_1tr1_1_1tuple__size_3_01tuple_3_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_'
before installing another version: File name too long
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
PS: i will test will the unstable dpkg version (i use the
experimental one , but there are not many changes by now ).
Even sending the bug report leads to errors:
i have a hundreds md5sums does not match (as the files are
missing ...). Then it asks if i really want to send the report.
By the way are those hundreds characters for a file really
usefull ? The documetation must not have reach the billion of
billion pages by now ... else adding more directory may help :)
Regards
Alban
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc5
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to C)
Versions of packages libstdc++6-4.0-doc depends on:
ii gcc-4.0-base 4.0-0pre8 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301140-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 09:47:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 01:47:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34]
(qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEOvh-00083Q-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:47:06 -0800
Received: (qmail 1933 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2005 09:47:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO descent.netsplit.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by populous.netsplit.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2005 09:47:01 -0000
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#301140: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to
manage this package : filenames too long (on my box at least)
From: Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debian GCC maintainers
<[email protected]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FF8PC9OdTWoCZx9qsHYY"
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:46:59 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-FF8PC9OdTWoCZx9qsHYY
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 17:03 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > reassign -1 dpkg
> Bug#301150: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to manage this package : filen=
ames too long (on my box at least)
> Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++6-4.0-doc' to `dpkg'.
>=20
(From the bug report)
> unable to clean up mess surrounding
> `./usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0-base/libstdc++/html_user/structstd_1_1tr1_1_1tup=
le__size_3_01tuple_3_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_=
00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class=
_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_'
> before installing another version: File name too long
The "File name too long" is an error returned by the rename() call,
specifically ENAMETOOLONG.
This filename is too long for your filesystem. I don't think dpkg
should randomly truncate or alter filenames, therefore there's nothing
dpkg can do here other than abort the installation.
Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--=-FF8PC9OdTWoCZx9qsHYY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCQoyTIexP3IStZ2wRAvg3AJ4vtUgagpu91kx8IMJn+AyEAsj9XwCeP+W1
bkQE6TWmBpSDY7STmns6PlU=
=Djcp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-FF8PC9OdTWoCZx9qsHYY--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
