Your message dated Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug was fixed in 2.95.4.ds15-23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 16:27:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 09:27:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from alephnull.demon.nl (enp2611.wantstofly.org) [83.160.184.112] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EVAbT-0005pd-00; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:27:47 -0700
Received: by enp2611.wantstofly.org (Postfix, from userid 0)
        id 99361260983; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:27:44 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0878747670=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-2.95: FTBFS [arm] gcc/config/arm/arm.c:556: error: invalid lvalue 
in
 assignment
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:27:43 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===============0878747670==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: gcc-2.95
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source

Now that gcc 4.0 is the default system compiler, gcc-2.95 ftbfs on
arm due to an 'invalid lvalue in assignment'.  The attached patch
fixes this issue.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: armeb (armv4b)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

--===============0878747670==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
        filename="gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-arm-ftbfs.patch"

--- gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules.patch.orig        2005-10-27 
18:03:41.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules.patch     2005-10-27 18:06:42.000000000 
+0200
@@ -140,11 +140,11 @@
 ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),arm)
   debian_patches += arm-pic arm-nested-func arm-various arm-exception \
        arm-const-double arm-tune arm-output-int libgcc-umodsi3 \
-       arm-profile
+       arm-profile arm-gcc4-fix
 endif
 all_patches += arm-pic arm-nested-func arm-various arm-exception \
        arm-const-double arm-tune arm-output-int libgcc-umodsi3 \
-       arm-profile
+       arm-profile arm-gcc4-fix
 
 ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),m68k)
   debian_patches += 68060-build gcc-m68k-pic m68k-md m68k-reload g77-m68k-pic
--- gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/patches/arm-gcc4-fix.dpatch.orig        
2005-10-27 18:03:26.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/patches/arm-gcc4-fix.dpatch     2005-10-27 
18:06:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+#! /bin/sh -e
+
+# DP: gcc4 build fix for arm (invalid lvalue in assignment)
+
+src=gcc
+if [ $# -eq 3 -a "$2" = '-d' ]; then
+    pdir="-d $3"
+    src=$3/gcc
+elif [ $# -ne 1 ]; then
+    echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
+    exit 1
+fi
+case "$1" in
+    -patch)
+        patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p0 --fuzz 10 < $0
+        ;;
+    -unpatch)
+        patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p0 --fuzz 10 < $0
+        ;;
+    *)
+        echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
+        exit 1
+esac
+exit 0
+
+--- gcc/config/arm/arm.c.orig  2001-01-25 20:39:56.000000000 +0100
++++ gcc/config/arm/arm.c       2005-10-27 18:00:57.000000000 +0200
+@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@
+   if ((TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT || arm_fpu != FP_HARD) && (tune_flags & FL_MODE32) 
== 0)
+     flag_schedule_insns = flag_schedule_insns_after_reload = 0;
+   
+-  arm_prog_mode = TARGET_APCS_32 ? PROG_MODE_PROG32 : PROG_MODE_PROG26;
++  arm_prgmode = TARGET_APCS_32 ? PROG_MODE_PROG32 : PROG_MODE_PROG26;
+   
+   if (structure_size_string != NULL)
+     {

--===============0878747670==--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336057-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 11:27:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 03 03:27:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx02.qsc.de ([213.148.130.14])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EiVYX-0000wY-L3; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 03:27:53 -0800
Received: from port-195-158-169-121.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.169.121] 
helo=hattusa.textio)
        by mx02.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 1EiVY2-0008PS-00; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 12:27:22 +0100
Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EiVY1-0002sq-K3; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This bug was fixed in 2.95.4.ds15-23
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

This bug was fixed in 2.95.4.ds15-23.


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to