Your message dated Fri, 2 Feb 2018 06:38:13 +0100 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line not a valid ABI change has caused the Debian Bug report #889106, regarding gcc-6: Support simpler multiarch systems to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 889106: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889106 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: gcc-6 Version: 6.4.0-12 Severity: wishlist Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173 One goal of a multiarch system is to make possible to run programs from any other architecture. ELF executables depend on an interpreter that should have a unique name; otherwise, loading the executable is complicated. Simpler multiarch systems use multiarch interpreter names. Thus, I ask if Debian could support such systems. Also, I would appreciate recommendations about proper interpreter names for Debian architectures. Upstream does not want to support these systems. glibc Debian maintainers, despite interoperability advantages, think these systems are ugly and must not be supported in Debian.[1] -- [1] https://bugs.debian.org/888073
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Moin You have been told that changing the interpreter. Please stop writing point-less bugs. Closing as even upstream thinks this is bullshit. Bastian -- There is an order of things in this universe. -- Apollo, "Who Mourns for Adonais?" stardate 3468.1
--- End Message ---
