On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Because the package will have to pass the NEW queue for saga-common, now > is a good time to split libsaga into separate packages matching the > SONAME (libsaga-api-2.2.6 & libsaga-gdi-2.2.6). Because the upstream > version is part of the package name then, you don't need to saga-depends > helper and virtual libsaga-2.2.6 package any more. > > Do you want to split the library package or rather keep them bundled in > libsaga for now? I was planning to split them, because I don't really like the saga-depends helper. I've found a smallish license problem, reported upstream: https://sourceforge.net/p/saga-gis/bugs/226/ Before uploading I'd like have an answer on that. Kind Regards, Johan
