On 04/01/2016 11:58 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Because the package will have to pass the NEW queue for saga-common, now >> is a good time to split libsaga into separate packages matching the >> SONAME (libsaga-api-2.2.6 & libsaga-gdi-2.2.6). Because the upstream >> version is part of the package name then, you don't need to saga-depends >> helper and virtual libsaga-2.2.6 package any more. >> >> Do you want to split the library package or rather keep them bundled in >> libsaga for now? > > I was planning to split them, because I don't really like the > saga-depends helper.
It does mean that the library package names change for every new upstream release, requiring the package to pass NEW and having the upload sponsored. That may be a bit too much of an inconvenience. > I've found a smallish license problem, reported upstream: > https://sourceforge.net/p/saga-gis/bugs/226/ > > Before uploading I'd like have an answer on that. Good catch. I've subscribed to that issue too. Kind regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
