On 12/16/25 9:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 12/16/25 12:45 AM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Il 15/12/25 17:30, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
On 12/13/25 5:23 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Please feel free to add to the list package that could be related to the one
indicated bu not included in the list.
geotiff would be useful to improve pywps test coverage:
https://github.com/KipCrossing/geotiff/
I can't find the motivation to package an optional dependency and commit to its
maintenance for a package I don't actually use myself.
We really need to get more geopython people involved in packaging, since Johan
v/d Wauw stopped contributing all of those packages are on life support not
getting the attention they need.
What packages are you referring to exactly?
pycsw & pywps specificly as geopython projects, but basically everything that has
"Johan Van de Wauw" in Uploaders.
There is some overlap with packages that have "Angelos Tzotsos" in Uploaders.
He's doing pretty much all the work on these packages in OSGeo-Live and
UbuntuGIS, but has proven unable to help maintain these in Debian.
geolinks, owslib, and pycsw were already mentioned because Johan is also in
Uploaders of those.
pygeoapi is still not in Debian.
python-osmapi is in reasonable shape, I haven't removed myself from Uploaders
because I introduced the package in Debian back when I was more willing to work
on packages I don't actually use myself but are included in OSGeo-Live.
pywps is in better shape now that it's using pytest markers, but upstream was
not convinced about its use for the geotiff, see:
https://github.com/geopython/pywps/pull/698
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
PGP Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
