On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 10:23:50PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 07:01:09PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > I'm a little concerned by the number of patches in the glibc packages. > > What do you think of the idea of requiring from here in that the > > description contain a note saying either (i) This is a backport from > > CVS or (ii) why this patch isn't included upstream and what the path > > Sounds good to me. Most of them are from current 2.2 CVS, or from 2.3 > CVS.
BTW, after -13, I'll go through the current patches, mark them, and also update to current 2.2.5+ CVS. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
