On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 12:23:27PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > BTW, some patches or bugs are already in upstream. > I contacted to Ulrich yesterday when 2.2.6 would be released. > The answer is "not decided yet, working 2.3 is more important". > "update to current 2.2.5+ CVS" means after -13 glibc package stands > on (a) the latest glibc-2-2-branch or (b) 2.3 CVS?
2.3 CVS does not run at all on hurd-i386 and is still ungoing major changes with fairly minimal testing. I think we need to stay away from it for a bit yet. > I think in the first we choose (a) is better (well, tests are > needed, but standing on 2002-01-17 is something old). That leads us > not to include the patches pulling out from 2.2/2.3 cvs one by > one. What do you think about it? I'm all for a CVS update after -13. I will get a package out tommorow, though of what we have now plus my Hurd patches. I'm trying to get that port booting again. =( -- I reincarnated for this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
