Hi, What do you think to maintain woody's glibc on debian glibc cvs? We simply do that the branch for woody derives from the first cvs image, and 2.2.5-11.1 is committed.
This merit is: we can maintain woody's glibc debs on cvs, similar to sarge/sid. In case we get RC bugs, we can easily reflect fix for not only sarge/sid but also woody. How do you feel this proposal? -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
