> Hi, > > What do you think to maintain woody's glibc on debian glibc cvs? > We simply do that the branch for woody derives from the first cvs > image, and 2.2.5-11.1 is committed. > > This merit is: we can maintain woody's glibc debs on cvs, similar to > sarge/sid. In case we get RC bugs, we can easily reflect fix for not > only sarge/sid but also woody. How do you feel this proposal? > > -- gotom >
Sounds like a great idea! I'm actively using the glibc cvs to keep changes up to date... this would make things even easier :) c. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
