At Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:02:37 -0400 (EDT), Jack Howarth wrote: > I was looking at your 0list patch list from the debian glibc cvs > and noticed you had two patches disabled which I was able to get to > apply to my locally rolled copy. These patches are... > > locales-de_CH > alpha-build-failure > > You might double check that those two patches aren't really > able to apply.
Thanks, I reversed. But I wonder the de_CH patch of both locales-stuff.dpatch and locales-de_CH.dpatch is needed. glibc-2-2-branch and glibc 2.2.92 is not applied these changes. The significant change is -d_fmt "<U0025><U0059><U002D><U0025><U006D><U002D><U0025><U0064>" %Y-%m-%d +d_fmt "<U0025><U0064><U002E><U0025><U006D><U002E><U0025><U0059>" %d-%m-%Y Is this needed for de_CH people? The format '%Y-%m-%d' is defined as ISO-8601. It seems more appropriate. Does anyone know about it? -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
