Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2002 23:48:57 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#157724: libc2/less/acrobat
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2002 08:54:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 21 03:54:10 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17hRFi-0006Ui-00; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 03:54:10 -0500
Received: from smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (smtpscan-nl3.philips.com [130.139.36.23])
        by gw-nl4.philips.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ED844C77
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:54:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
        by smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id 
KAA29118
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:54:08 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from prle1.natlab.research.philips.com (prle1.natlab.research.philips.com 
[130.145.137.162]) 
        by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id 
KAA03200
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:54:08 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from pc8696 (pc8696 [130.145.176.239])
        by prle1.natlab.research.philips.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7L8s8S20536
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:54:08 +0200 (METDST)
Received: from pjotr by pc8696 with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 17hRFg-0007wF-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:54:08 +0200
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:54:08 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc2/less/acrobat
Message-ID: <20020821085402.GC25413@pc8696>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-14

When I invoke less (version 376-3) or acroread (4.05-5), both fail
with a read that is too short. That is, less simply doesn't show (part
of) the file, and acroread complains:
-----------------------------------------
acroread: ../../Source/ATM/Extra/Edge/FileCore.cpp:322: CTBool
CTFile::Write(const void *, unsigned int): Assertion `nWritten ==
nCount' failed.
/usr/bin/acroread: line 8: 25483 Aborted
/usr/lib/Acrobat4/bin/acroread "$@"
-----------------------------------------

Note that this problem doesn't occur under root.

I suspect there is some kind of a bug in libc6.

I am using Debian testing, virgin kernel 2.4.18.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 157724-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2002 14:48:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 31 09:48:59 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17l9YY-0004ik-00; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 09:48:59 -0500
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
        by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id D0BA4C3557; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 23:48:57 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 23:48:57 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pjotr Kourzanov),
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#157724: libc2/less/acrobat
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <20020821085402.GC25413@pc8696>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

At Thu, 22 Aug 2002 07:54:58 +0200,
Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 08:47:50PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:54:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Package: libc6
> > > Version: 2.2.5-14
> > > 
> > > When I invoke less (version 376-3) or acroread (4.05-5), both fail
> > > with a read that is too short. That is, less simply doesn't show (part
> > > of) the file, and acroread complains:
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > acroread: ../../Source/ATM/Extra/Edge/FileCore.cpp:322: CTBool
> > > CTFile::Write(const void *, unsigned int): Assertion `nWritten ==
> > > nCount' failed.
> > > /usr/bin/acroread: line 8: 25483 Aborted
> > > /usr/lib/Acrobat4/bin/acroread "$@"
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > Note that this problem doesn't occur under root.
> > > 
> > > I suspect there is some kind of a bug in libc6.
> > > 
> > > I am using Debian testing, virgin kernel 2.4.18.
> > 
> > If it doesn't occur under root, then I suspect you have something odd in
> > your user settings. Maybe screwed up ulimits? Maybe a preloaded library
> > borking things up?
> > 
> > I seriously doubt this is a libc bug.
> 
>   You have every reason to. I will need some time to hunt this down,
> and time is a precious resource...
> 
>   It is unlikely to be one of the things you mention, as I didn't
> touch any of my account settings and it used to work before I
> upgraded to that libc version...

There is no reason to remain such vague bug on BTS. I close it.

-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to