On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:09:07PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > There are two cases where people have been trying to add R_*_NONE > workarounds to glibc. That looks like it's handling PLT relocations > rather than general relocations, which means that almost certainly a > PLT entry was not emitted that should have been. I think I know > why; give me a day or two to check if the problem I found also > affects M68K. I'll post the ARM patch also.
We've had a few cases of (as Roland McGrath put it) "Over eager PLT reduction". Upstream has been reasonably friendly about it. tks, Jeff Bailey -- At last you cry out in anguish: "Why me?" God answers: "Why not?" - Sheldon Kopp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
