On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:30:48PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This is almost certainly a sign that you have bugs in the linker. > > I'm not sure we should be putting this kind of patch into glibc.
> correct, it is a workaround for a binutils problem but the binutils > which trigger it are already long out. Apparently the problem gets > triggered only in combination with gcc-3.2 which is why it wasn't > noticed earlier. We've got patches like this in our local glibc for ia64 already, so it's not unheard of. I just worry about creating ABI baggage that we'll have to drag around with us. (I haven't looked at this specific patch yet) Tks, Jeff Bailey -- At last you cry out in anguish: "Why me?" God answers: "Why not?" - Sheldon Kopp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
