Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2003 02:53:08 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205860: libc6: ld.so.conf should be included
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2003 04:30:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 16 23:30:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pthierry.net1.nerim.net (imperatrice.arcanes) [213.41.153.205]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19oFBo-0002pA-00; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:30:48 -0500
Received: by imperatrice.arcanes (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 122DE8E091; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 06:48:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 06:48:45 +0200
From: Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: ld.so.conf should be included
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18-686 i686
X-Sheldon-Has-Said: Mange ton =?iso-8859-1?B?Y+Jj4uI=?= !
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-16
Severity: wishlist
The policy mention the /etc/ld.so.conf, and gives a somewhat default
content for it, so this file should be included in libc6.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux imperatrice.arcanes 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 200=
2 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines=
[gl
--=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Pwksxe13INnVDYoRAutVAJsFA47gqqh0zW+g7Df/aETA7b/Z2gCg313g
7iO+eahvGBL62Pppd3jBaz4=
=GLgC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 205860-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2003 17:53:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 17 12:53:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19oRiH-0004lT-00; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 12:53:09 -0500
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 195A0C33C6; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 02:53:08 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 02:53:08 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#205860: libc6: ld.so.conf should be included
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
At Sun, 17 Aug 2003 06:48:45 +0200,
Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.1-16
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The policy mention the /etc/ld.so.conf, and gives a somewhat default
> content for it, so this file should be included in libc6.
/etc/ld.so.conf is generated by ldso package. I don't see why you
want to include this file into libc6. Any reasons?
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
