Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:34:53 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205860: libc6: ld.so.conf should be included
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2003 04:30:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 16 23:30:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pthierry.net1.nerim.net (imperatrice.arcanes) [213.41.153.205]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19oFBo-0002pA-00; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:30:48 -0500
Received: by imperatrice.arcanes (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 122DE8E091; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 06:48:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 06:48:45 +0200
From: Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: ld.so.conf should be included
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18-686 i686
X-Sheldon-Has-Said: Mange ton =?iso-8859-1?B?Y+Jj4uI=?= !
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-16
Severity: wishlist
The policy mention the /etc/ld.so.conf, and gives a somewhat default
content for it, so this file should be included in libc6.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux imperatrice.arcanes 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 200=
2 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines=
[gl
--=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Pwksxe13INnVDYoRAutVAJsFA47gqqh0zW+g7Df/aETA7b/Z2gCg313g
7iO+eahvGBL62Pppd3jBaz4=
=GLgC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 205860-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2003 11:34:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 18 06:34:54 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19oiHm-000544-00; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 06:34:54 -0500
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 21BCFC33C6; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:34:53 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:34:53 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#205860: libc6: ld.so.conf should be included
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.1 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:28:46 +0100,
Colin Watson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:48:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> > > Taken from the ldso Description:
> > >
> > > You do not need this package unless you have very old programs
> > > which use libc4 or libc5. The libc6 package has its own dynamic
> > > linker that is used for all current programs.
> > >
> > > The libc6 package contains /sbin/ldconfig, that generates
> > > /etc/ld.so.conf. The bug should be reopened, IMHO.
/sbin/ldconfig does not generate /etc/ld.so.conf. ld.so.conf is used
only for ldconfig default configuration file. Read ldconfig(8).
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> dpkg -s ldso | grep Priority
> > Priority: required
>
> Your dpkg is confused and is reporting old data (which does sometimes
> happen; I think there are bug reports about it).
Ah, sorry. That's right.
> Package: ldso
> Priority: optional
> Section: oldlibs
> Installed-Size: 188
> Maintainer: David Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Architecture: i386
> Source: ld.so
> Version: 1.9.11-15
> Replaces: libc6
> Provides: libdl1
> Depends: libc6 (>=2.1.94)
> Filename: pool/main/l/ld.so/ldso_1.9.11-15_i386.deb
> Size: 78980
> MD5sum: e36262f73c3229568281e1e3ee38af36
> Description: The Linux dynamic linker and library for libc4 and libc5.
> This dynamic linker provides the user-level support for loading and
> linking DLL and ELF shared libraries. You do not need this package
> unless you have very old programs which use libc4 or libc5. The libc6
> package has its own dynamic linker that is used for all current
> programs.
>
> I'm not sure that libc6 actually needs to generate this file, though.
> The comment about its contents in policy is purely informational.
/etc/ld.so.conf is not needed for libc6. It's needed for some
programs that put libraries on a directory (not /usr/lib or /lib).
The major example is X libraries, /usr/X11R6/lib. Another example is
/usr/local/lib, if user wants to add.
I close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
