On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:22:01AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > i'd like that libc6.1-dbg as well as libc6-dbg and libc0.3-dbg provided > > libc-dbg virtual package. > > Why? Nothing should depend on these packages, AFAIK... > a dependency maybe not, but IMHO libfoo-dbg should suggest libc-dbg. making a suggestion for libc6-dbg | libc6.1-dbg | libc0.3-dbg is a hack.
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
