On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:36:01PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > i'd like that libc6.1-dbg as well as libc6-dbg and libc0.3-dbg > > > provided libc-dbg virtual package.
> > Why? Nothing should depend on these packages, AFAIK... > a dependency maybe not, but IMHO libfoo-dbg should suggest libc-dbg. > making a suggestion for libc6-dbg | libc6.1-dbg | libc0.3-dbg is a > hack. I don't think that it should really recommend this. The average person doing debugging doesn't really have a strong need to dig through glibc internals. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
