On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:06:56PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > severity 184565 wishlist > > > thanks > > > > why wishlist?
> Well, there are a lot of reasons - one is to support them needs not > only glibc but also hurd design. glibc BTS is for glibc, not hurd. I > feel it's difficult to implement them with only glibc modification > from looking at the hurd lists archive. This is request for hurd > itself. I concur that this is wishlist - It's not the Debian glibc maintainers jobs to write hurd-i386 functionality (or any other ports functionality - linux included) We also have other important things to work on with hurd-i386's glibc. I compiled up the glibc CVS this morning and will go back to fixing make check problems tomorrow or the day after. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- (08:53:07) Jeff: (why don't people just use centimetres like God Intended? *g*) (08:53:22) Christina: must just be a unitarian god.. :P
