On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:51:41PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > Well, there are a lot of reasons - one is to support them needs not > > only glibc but also hurd design. glibc BTS is for glibc, not hurd. I > > feel it's difficult to implement them with only glibc modification > > from looking at the hurd lists archive. This is request for hurd > > itself.
then it might need reassigning, but this doesn't affect the severity (note the lack of this feature breaks other packages) > I concur that this is wishlist - It's not the Debian glibc maintainers > jobs to write hurd-i386 functionality (or any other ports functionality > - linux included) the Debian glibc maintainers are volunteers who just fix what they like to fix, but the bug is there for anyone to send a patch. the severity means not any obligation or whatever. anyway, my bug is pretty noticeable as a wishlist in libc0.3's list with only 4 entries, so i don't care much. -- Robert Millan make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop. Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide
