At Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:03:07 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > >Well it's not coreutils bug, and I think it's not glibc bug; see my > >mail in #93810. > > I don't agree with your conclusion. AEST and EST may both be used, and > EST may even be more prominant in .au. (Of course, the google search > results aren't useful because it's unclear which EST the hits refer > to...) But it seems that people in .au can understand what AEST refers > to and that using AEST would eliminate some confusion. I don't see a > down side to using AEST instead of EST.
No, it's not my conclusion. It's [EMAIL PROTECTED] upstream conclusion which has been discussed for a long time. I only follow their opinion. Your "prominent" is only your "feeling" or "personal opinion", what is the different from the google search. And what do you think about "IST"? At least two bugs are too much to stay in BTS. Regards, -- gotom
