To _really_ have a working 2.6 based system the libc should be NPTL aware; debian will likely need to vut over to it sooner rather than later.
What about running commands having set: export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 or LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 <binary> regards, Mike On Thu, Nov 06 2003 at 21:59, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi debian-amd64 guys, > > We're encountering #218657. This bug says many programs become > unusable when libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 + kernel 2.6 is used on amd64 > architecture. We all debian-glibc developers can't access such > machine, so could anyone try to reproduce and track this problem? > > (I resend this mail because the past one was not reached to debian-amd64) > > At Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:25:22 -0500, > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > I tested with kernel versions 2.6.0-test8 initially and then > > > 2.6.0-test7 with the same results. I believe than NTPL is compiled in > > > by default in 2.6.0 test kernels. > > > > > > I was unsure whether to file this bug report since it occurred on > > > x86_64 kernel which is not officially supported by Debian. > > > > > > Again, after reverting to 2.3.2-9, all was well again. > > > > Well, I've got no idea. Someone with access to such a system gets to > > debug this. > > Regards, > -- gotom > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
