On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 03:07:01PM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Yes, substantially. But LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 should undo it. You'll > > have dig further. > > Well, it's not fixing this issue: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 df . > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > df: `/home': Bad address > > > It's not really a testsuite, just a lot of little test programs. I > > doubt it will tell you anything new. > > Most things seem to work well. So far, statfs is the only reproducible > problem.
I thought you said gcc was broken? If it's just statfs, look to the kernel's 32-bit wrapper for that syscall for the bug, probably. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
