On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:51:41PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Apparently on a current mipsel (using sid), there are these errors
> regarding enidanness during building of some packages. Probably
> something changed in linux-libc-dev, though userspace should avoid using
> kernelspace headers when possible AFAICS and should probably use
> <endian.h> instead of <asm/byteorder.h>.
> 
> Should I file bugs for the packages that FTBFS because of this?
> 

I think there are actually two problems:
- Programs that include <linux/*.h> which in fine includes
  <asm/byteorder.h>. This is definitely a problem of the kernel headers.
- Programs that FTBFS because they include <asm/byteorder.h>. They could
  be fixed by switching to <endian.h>, but I don't think it could be
  considered as an RC bug, as the kernel headers have to be fixed
  anyway.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to