On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:34:12PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 07:49:16PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:51:41PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > >> Hi > > >> > > >> Apparently on a current mipsel (using sid), there are these errors > > >> regarding enidanness during building of some packages. Probably > > >> something changed in linux-libc-dev, though userspace should avoid using > > >> kernelspace headers when possible AFAICS and should probably use > > >> <endian.h> instead of <asm/byteorder.h>. > > >> > > >> Should I file bugs for the packages that FTBFS because of this? > > >> > > > > > > I think there are actually two problems: > > > - Programs that include <linux/*.h> which in fine includes > > > <asm/byteorder.h>. This is definitely a problem of the kernel headers. > > > > Is this bug filed? If not, could you take care of that, TIA? > > Not yet, I am trying to understand the problem. It seems it only happens > if <sys/types.h> is included before <asm/byteorder.h> >
Filed as bug#519761, with a patch. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
