On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:17:41AM +0100, Jerome Vizcaino wrote: > Ok about the patches : there had to be a reason for those not to be merged > upstream.
Also I think they have never been submitted upstream. They are from 2002... > Some of my co-workers noticed the performance improvement when binding values > between -pi and pi but the thing is, this kind of trick do not need to be > applied when on 32 bits systems... Libm's behavior is not really arch-proof > in > terms of performance which is a bit confusing (and I would expect 64 bit > being > better than 32 bits when dealing with maths... :( cosf/sinf is actually twice faster on 64-bit than on 32-bit in normal cases, but can be a lot slower in the cases that concern you. > Have you tried pushing your code upstream ? Maybe this would be useful for > future versions. > It's currently not clean enough to be send upstream. I'll try to send it upstream, but I don't have to much hope. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100307232342.gg...@hall.aurel32.net
