Aurelien Jarno wrote: > What needs to happen is mainly to have upstream to care about locales, > and it is exactly why this patches have been added to Debian, and why at > some points we had some locales in belocs-locales. > > Things might have changes slightly, and we can also now send patches to > eglibc instead of glibc. That said, a big part of this patches are > needed due to the changes we have done to the locales, so they do not > make a lot of sense as a standalone series.
Makes sense (and I imagined that the locales would motivate at least some of these patches). It's a bigger and more daunting task but still it should not take too long to go through the localedata patches and see what they do and if there are standards that can be used to justify them easily to upstream. I'll work on that. Thank you, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110511140205.GA8996@elie
