Le 11/05/2011 16:03, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : >> > Things might have changes slightly, and we can also now send patches to >> > eglibc instead of glibc. That said, a big part of this patches are >> > needed due to the changes we have done to the locales, so they do not >> > make a lot of sense as a standalone series. > Makes sense (and I imagined that the locales would motivate at least > some of these patches). It's a bigger and more daunting task but > still it should not take too long to go through the localedata patches > and see what they do and if there are standards that can be used to > justify them easily to upstream. I'll work on that.
Ok, thanks. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
