On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >Hi, > >At the end of last year the patch unsubmitted-ldconfig-cache-abi.diff >has been added, but has not been submitted upstream despite asking a few >times. This patch provides correct ldconfig support for systems with >both armel and armhf libraries. > >The situation is now that this patch breaks MIPS N64 support due >to a missing break in a case (easily fixable), but also that upstream >has reused the same tag value for x32 support: > > Debian 2.13: > #define FLAG_ARM_HFABI 0x0800 > > Upstream HEAD: > #define FLAG_X8664_LIBX32 0x0800
Sigh. >As a consequence the armhf value will have to be changed in the future, >which might have some side effects. We'd have to make sure that the ldconfig cache is re-generated after the change, to make sure things don't break. >For now I guess the best change is simply to disable this patch for >wheezy, which is already done in the SVN, and will land to send in the >next upload. I'll ask debian-release to allow migration of the package >to wheezy. I am also ready to re-enable this patch for wheezy once it >has been merged upstream, or even when at least the tag value is merged >upstream. I'm in the middle of re-working the patch for upstream, but it's slow going at the moment. I'm trying to get reviews for definitions of the PT_ARM_ARCH_EXT segment, and that's been held up. :-( Cheers, -- Steve McIntyre steve.mcint...@linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120705173641.gb19...@einval.com