Hi, On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:54:27PM -0600, Philipp Kern wrote: > Aurelien, > > thanks for informing us. > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > As a consequence the armhf value will have to be changed in the future, > > which might have some side effects. > > What kind of side effects might happen? I.e. is it likely to break pure armhf > systems in any way? When would one mix and match armel and armhf libraries? >
Hi don't fully know this part of the code, but I doubt it will break pure armhf systems. The problem will happen on systems with both armhf and armel or with x32 and armhf. The system might not find non-native libraries. One way to workaround that is to remove the ldconfig caches during the postinst, and recreate them by calling ldconfig. Regards, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
