On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:01:45AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:37PM +0800, Yunqiang Su wrote:
> >> Hi, as I asked that guys, they insist on using /usr/lib but not 
> >> /usr/libo32. :-(
> >
> > Who are the guys? What is the argument on using /usr/lib instead of
> > /usr/libo32?
> >
> 
> See https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2014/05/msg00050.html
> 
> I guess the standard he refers means the "MIPS N32 ABI Handbook".

Debian doesn't follow the standard already by putting the 64-bit
libraries in /lib instead of /lib64, so I don't consider the argument
that we should follow the standard for o32 libraries as valid.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
[email protected]                 http://www.aurel32.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to