On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:21:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:01:45AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:37PM +0800, Yunqiang Su wrote: > > >> Hi, as I asked that guys, they insist on using /usr/lib but not > > >> /usr/libo32. :-( > > > > > > Who are the guys? What is the argument on using /usr/lib instead of > > > /usr/libo32? > > > > > > > See https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2014/05/msg00050.html > > > > I guess the standard he refers means the "MIPS N32 ABI Handbook". > > Debian doesn't follow the standard already by putting the 64-bit > libraries in /lib instead of /lib64, so I don't consider the argument > that we should follow the standard for o32 libraries as valid.
Oh, and I forgot to add we are talking about a quite limited set of packages which will have to use /libo32, and that list will probably get even smaller with jessie. It's basically packages built from either gcc-4.X, eglibc, ncurses, readline6 and zlib. All other o32 packages installed through multiarch will go to (/usr)/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140609213042.ge2...@hall.aurel32.net