On 26/04/26 6:25 pm, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Thanks for opening MRs instead of doing a direct revert, and thanks > for creating two MRs so people can vote between moving the new changes > under the title "Proposed" (!22) instead of just throwing away all > changes (!21) that went in via multiple MRs over several weeks. > Hopefully more people will cast their vote. Currently the 3 people who > have voted to throw away the changes and a completely separate group > of people from those 7 people who participated in making them, so if > you intend to merge !21, I think it should have at least 8 or more > votes before you merge it. The threshold has been reached now. There are now 8 votes on !21 and 5 on !22 (with downvotes of 1 and 2 respectively).
Richard Hansen, who was the one preparing all the changes over several months, and whose changes were are talking about reverting also voted in favour of !21 and downvoted !22. I think there is not much (or any) confusion now, and !21 can and should be merged. I'd still like to have a buffer window if in case more folks would like to give feedback. So I'll wait for a month (until June 25) from now before hitting the merge button. Will also send a reminder mail 1 day before merging this. Thanks -n
